[governance] Formal IGC response to IBSA proposal ahead of 18-19 Summit?

[McTim]

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
> It's worth stying something, endorse Nupef and go further:  emphasize our
> disappointment that the recommendation is misleadingly represented as the
> outcome of an multi-stakeholder meeting.  That the IGC strongly disagrees
> with the creation of a new body, and strongly disagrees with the six points
> about such a body.  Suggest that the creation of an IBSA IG development
> observatory based on such misleading interpretations would be ill advised.

+1

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t