[governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .?? (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?

[Daniel Kalchev]

On 10.11.11 15:27, Avri Doria wrote:
> If I understood correctly, this is a bad thing, and this issue of .бг is just the tip of the iceberg of a really serious defect in the ICANN process for new TLDs.

As I commented during the event, while the .бг and .ελ applications are 
non-commercial in nature and do not expect any monetary returns, that 
is, anything spent is for the good of the community --- this will not be 
so in the new gTLD process.
Not only the new gTLD process is very expensive for applicants, but it 
may turn out that they have wasted all that funds and effort in vain, 
with an anonymous panel to decide if they may have their string or it is 
'confusing' someone.

Perhaps, as one fellow said long ago during the COCOM times "Whatever 
you cannot buy with money, you can buy with more money". Commissioner 
times ahead?

Daniel

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t