[governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .?? (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?

[Imran Ahmed Shah]

The .бг and .ελ are non-commercial being a ccTLD, and they are confusingly similar with the .br and .EA, and so, rejected once.

.бг and .ελ
.br and .EA

What if they will be applied from the same applicants in new gTLD program, it will remain non-commercial unless the applicants are swap or changed.
New study tells that instead of changing the consumer minds, change of the ownership of the products or services or command may give you better results.
So, applying this new approach, will give following results:

.бг to .br  
.ελ  to .EA
(consumers will  be offered to enjoy the Visual Similarity, even the .bg users will also be able to get their domain registered Блгария.Бг)

Now, read it again and smile, it has become a commercial model. New gTLD have no concern, what IDN Language do you select.

But the hindrance or limitations in implementation of my Commercial Business model is these two small units, that are have applied the same strings for useless IDN ccLTDs under fast track. So, how to slide this obstacle/barrier off the road. There is again method one, as Daniel quoted, spend more money. Otherwise method to study the new approaching formulation. That tells a common formula of stamina to assess the holding power, just create confusions.

And that has been created with a small two words "confusingly similar".

:)

Imran Ahmad Shah

> -----Original Message-----
> From: governance at lists.cpsr.org [mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org] On
> Behalf Of Daniel Kalchev
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 07:08 PM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Subject: Re: [governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .?? (.bg) similar to other
> Latin ccTLDs?
> 
> 
> 
> On 10.11.11 15:27, Avri Doria wrote:
> > If I understood correctly, this is a bad thing, and this issue of .бг is just the
> tip of the iceberg of a really serious defect in the ICANN process for new
> TLDs.
> 
> As I commented during the event, while the .бг and .ελ applications are non-
> commercial in nature and do not expect any monetary returns, that is,
> anything spent is for the good of the community --- this will not be so in the
> new gTLD process.
> Not only the new gTLD process is very expensive for applicants, but it may
> turn out that they have wasted all that funds and effort in vain, with an
> anonymous panel to decide if they may have their string or it is 'confusing'
> someone.
> 
> Perhaps, as one fellow said long ago during the COCOM times "Whatever you
> cannot buy with money, you can buy with more money". Commissioner
> times ahead?
> 
> Daniel
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> __
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t