And G20? Re: [governance] Internet G8 meeting

Divina MEIGS divina.meigs at orange.fr
Thu May 12 02:56:32 EDT 2011 

Hello

To me it seems we have to take a step at a time. The E-G8 starts soon, it
probably will pave the way for an E-G20... If we let the precedent happen
without protest, it will be harder to argue later for entry in E-G20.

divina

Le 11/05/11 14:36, « Avri Doria » <avri at ella.com> a écrit :

> Hi,
> 
> I am not sure I understand the suggestion.  Is that that we suggest that they
> not have a eG8 but have an 'eG20' instead?
> 
> As far as I understand the eG8 is already planned and the some
> people/organizations already have their invitations.  We want invitations for
> civil society becasue we want a seat at any table where these issues are being
> discussed on a global basis.
> 
> The issue of G8 versus G20 would be a different one and one that at least for
> the moment is a bit late in relations to this event.
> 
> Of course if there is a 'eG20', we should have argue for a seat at that table.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> On 11 May 2011, at 05:24, Marilia Maciel wrote:
> 
>> Despite being more inclusive in terms of geopolitical representation, I
>> believe G20 does not fulfill the need to the kind of discussions we are
>> advocating in our statement: open to all countries on equal footing and
>> genuinely multistakeholder.  But it would make sense if countries excluded
>> from the debate in the G8 use the possibility to take the debate to G20 as a
>> way of political pressure.
>> 
>> Marília
>> 
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Meryem Marzouki <meryem at marzouki.info>
>> wrote:
>> And why not the G20? Just curious about the arguments.
>> Meryem
>> 
>> Le 11 mai 2011 à 11:56, Jeanette Hofmann a écrit :
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I think it is too late to change the statement since the voting has started.
>>> 
>>> I have voted already but would want to withdraw my support for the statement
>>> if we would change it and now suggest that the G20 is our preferred group to
>>> address Internet policies.
>>> 
>>> jeanette
>>> 
>>> On 11.05.2011 11:38, Meryem Marzouki wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry, I'm jumping in even later than Bill!
>>>> 
>>>> I think the statement is OK w.r.t. Bill's comment, precisely because, as
>>>> Jeremy pointed, it asks for the eG8, and not the G8 itself, to be open
>>>> to other stakeholders. That doesn't contradict the fact that the G8 will
>>>> probably adopt at least some kind of declaration, on the basis of the
>>>> eG8 conclusions.
>>>> 
>>>> But I would like to suggest an addition, which I think wouldn't
>>>> radically change the statement and is in line with IGC positions so far.
>>>> This year and under the French presidency, there's not only the G8
>>>> Summit (26-27 May in Dauville) but also the G20 Summit (3-4 November in
>>>> Cannes). It's particularly noticeable that the e-thing is held under the
>>>> G8 and not the G20.
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe we can add a sentence (related to our statement that " policies
>>>> framed together by the most powerful nations, quite likely, will become
>>>> the default global norm", 5th para) stating that Internet issues should
>>>> have been addressed by the G20 rather than the G8. I think that, in
>>>> addition, this would certainly be backed by some of the governments from
>>>> the 12 excluded countries (not to mention those that are not even part
>>>> of G20). If there are no objection, I'm confident that Jeremy and Izumi
>>>> could draft a good sentence to express this point.
>>>> 
>>>> BTW, the website of the French presidency of G8-G20 is at:
>>>> http://www.g20-g8.com, and there's an English version available.
>>>> 
>>>> Finally one question: will the statement be submitted to NGO signatures
>>>> (I mean especially outsite the IGC)?
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Meryem
>>>> 
>>>> Le 11 mai 2011 à 10:39, William Drake a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On May 11, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The proposed eG8 will not be a negotiating forum, any more than the
>>>>>> IGF. In that respect, it is nothing like the G8 meetings proper. So I
>>>>>> don't see that there is an inconsistency here.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I had a different impression based on the side events of past 68
>>>>> summits, For example the Okinawa summit released the World Ec Forum's
>>>>> report and recs on the global digital divide (which I wrote) and the
>>>>> main meeting endorsed their thrust and promised cash (which generally
>>>>> failed to materialize). Other summits have made similarly declarations
>>>>> on cybersecurity and whatnot that came in part from non-IGO adjuncts.
>>>>> And the news reportage on this one
>>>>> http://www.telecompaper.com/news/internet-g8-to-be-held-in-paris-on-24-25-
>>>>> may
>>>>> says The "Internet G8", a conference to be held in Paris on 24-25 May
>>>>> before the official G8 summit in Deauville, has been conceived t*o
>>>>> generate debate and ultimately a set of proposals from private sector
>>>>> stakeholders for the consideration of the eight heads of government,*
>>>>> *
>>>>> *
>>>>> Maybe our French colleagues can clarify the precise agenda, but from
>>>>> what I'd hear this may be another one of those international events in
>>>>> which Sarko tries to launch some big new initiatives that's not been
>>>>> fully vetted with counterpart countries. In this context, it'd be
>>>>> surprising if there are no recs or declarations of any sort being
>>>>> provided by the private sector heavies he's assembled. And if so, then
>>>>> the IGF is sort of an odd model to say they should follow, no?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing somethingŠ.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bill
>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>> governance at lists.cpsr.org <mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org>
>>>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>>> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>>>> 
>>>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>>> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Meryem Marzouki - Paris, France
>>>> Email: meryem at marzouki.info <mailto:meryem at marzouki.info>
>>>> Lab. LIP6/CNRS/UPMC - www-polytic.lip6.fr <http://www-polytic.lip6.fr>
>>>> IRIS (Imaginons un réseau Internet solidaire) - www.iris.sgdg.org
>>>> <http://www.iris.sgdg.org>
>>>> EDRI (European Digital Rights) - www.edri.org <http://www.edri.org>
>>>> 
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>    governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>> 
>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>    http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>> 
>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Meryem Marzouki - Paris, France
>> Email: meryem at marzouki.info
>> Lab. LIP6/CNRS/UPMC - www-polytic.lip6.fr
>> IRIS (Imaginons un réseau Internet solidaire) - www.iris.sgdg.org
>> EDRI (European Digital Rights) - www.edri.org
>> 
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>> 
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>> 
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
>> FGV Direito Rio
>> 
>> Center for Technology and Society
>> Getulio Vargas Foundation
>> Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>> 
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>> 
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> 


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

More information about the Governance mailing list