And G20? Re: [governance] Internet G8 meeting

[William Drake]

On May 11, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Meryem Marzouki wrote:

>  think the statement is OK w.r.t. Bill's comment, precisely because, as Jeremy pointed, it asks for the eG8, and not the G8 itself, to be open to other stakeholders. That doesn't contradict the fact that the G8 will probably adopt at least some kind of declaration, on the basis of the eG8 conclusions.

What I said was that If the eG8 aspires to advance conclusions as you suggest, the IGF, which is not currently set up to advance conclusions, might not be the best model for its activities.  Doesn't matter.

Best
BD____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t