[governance] China and IGF

[Norbert Bollow]

Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:

> The First point, I do not agree with. IGF is forum for dialogue, not
> for solving the substantive issues, under Tunis Agenda, it's very
> clear.

I totally agree with Izumi on this point of course... however, I would
agree with the Chinese position to some extent also, in that overall
there is not enough progress towards solving the substantive issues,
and the IGF needs to become more focused of generating dialogue in
such a way that the dialogue significantly contributes towards solving
the substantive issues.

Greetings,
Norbert
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t