[governance] CSTD Q2-Format of IGF meetings

[Marilia Maciel]

Obs: question 1 is a general "setting the scene"

Summary of the contributions during the consultations:


-          Continue and reinforce the openness of the meeting, for instance:


o   No accreditation

o   Multistakeholder participation

o   Participation on equal footing

o   Bottom-up organization (dynamic coalitions and workshops)

* *

-          Develop a template for the proposal of workshops. It would make
evaluation of the proposals easier and would allow limiting by default the
number of speakers.

-          Stricter evaluation of the workshop proposals. Reduction of the
number of panellists

-          Participants should be able to give feedback and evaluate the
workshops they attended online

-          Two first days of the IGF dedicated to workshops and the two last
days dedicated to main sessions, best practices fora, roundtables

-          Wrap-up workshops that would summarize discussions carried out in
several workshops and forward an input to the main session

-          The IGF should focus on public policy issues and controversial
issues, rather than technical details and innovations




-- 
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
FGV Direito Rio

Center for Technology and Society
Getulio Vargas Foundation
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20110124/44cce774/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t