[governance] FINAL? DRAFT statement on enhanced cooperation
Baudouin SCHOMBE
b.schombe at gmail.com
Thu Nov 11 09:21:45 EST 2010
I think, Marilia, your suggestion also deserves attention.
Not having a stable internet connection because of technical problems
(electricity cuts frequently...), Jean Louis and Parminder could help us in
providing these elements of the OECD so that we could enjoy all the ins and
outs of these documents.
We are at a critical stage in our evolution and I think it would be
desirable to keep us all constructive whatever our differences.
Écouter
Lire phonétiquement
Baudouin
2010/11/11 Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>
> Dear Parminder,
>
> I could never follow the process in OECD as close as it deserved, but your
> e-mail has really caught my attention.
> I would like to learn more about this arrangement in OECD. Could you (or
> anyone else on the list) please share some resources?
>
> Thank you.
> Marília
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:25 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi All
>>
>> I am still not able to understand how so many of those who are against any
>> new institutional framework for evolving global IG related public policies,
>> which is democratic in inclusion of all countries and stakeholders, have
>> enthusiastically supported a similar framework among OECD countries? I mean
>> the OECD's Committee For Information, Computer and Communication Policy,
>> which has a very active portfolio for helping develop Internet policies, esp
>> those with trans-border ramification. Many CS members in the IGC have
>> actively organized themselves to associate with the work of this OECD's
>> institutional framework.
>>
>> Why should such a framework not exist at a global level? And I do think
>> that OECD's framework is not multistakeholder enough. My proposal is for a
>> global framework of similar kind (to OECD's) that will help develop globally
>> applicable Internet related public policies, which is what the 'enhanced
>> cooperation' process is about, that is much more multistakeholder than the
>> existing OECD one
>>
>> I request a specific response for those who have supported the OECD
>> framework rather enthusiastically, and this includes most here on the IGC
>> list who now oppose similar new institutional developments at the global
>> level , how do they justify this opposition now, for a similar global
>> institutional framework.
>>
>> Unfortunately, many developing country IGC members here have gone along
>> with this opposition to a global UN anchored body, which can be no
>> different from the OECD arrangement. I am able to unserstand thier stanc
>> eeven more.
>>
>> Should we depend on OECD to make global Internet policies. That is what is
>> being said in this support for a OECD framework but opposition to a similar
>> global framework one, for addressing the urgent need for global Interent
>> related public policies. .
>>
>> For this reason I cannot support the present draft statement. But if
>> someone can give me some justification clarifying the above paradox, I am
>> very much willing to listen.
>>
>> Parminder
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
> FGV Direito Rio
>
> Center for Technology and Society
> Getulio Vargas Foundation
> Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101111/457564c6/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list