[governance] FINAL? DRAFT statement on enhanced cooperation

[Marilia Maciel]

I feel I need to say that I am supporting this draft because I believe it is
the possible consensus we are able to reach by the end of the present week.


But then I ned to ask: will the lively debate that is currently taking place
cease when we send our statement? I hope not, because the present statement
is definitely not an IGC position on EC. So the debate needs to continue,
both on what was called “core EC” and “broader conditions for EC”: how to
define it? do we need it? in which ares? how to implement it? If we don’t
have a proposal to put on the table and bargain, others will decide for us.


I believe we have plenty of great exchanges, concrete suggestions (on one
side and the other) and good starting point do advance to a more concrete
position in the near future. But we need to map what has been said about EC
so far, put them in a charter so we can visualize it.  Could the
coordinators help us do it? What would be the best way to proceed? Maybe it
is time for the wiki you guys mentioned?


Best,

Marilia


Ps:@Kati, regarding ACTA, not being aware of the intentions, this is how I
understood the paragraph, through literal reading.  I have gone through the
e-mails trying to find when the reference to ACTA was included, but was
unable to.


On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Katitza Rodriguez <katitza at eff.org> wrote:

> Parminder's intention go far beyond yours, Marilia if I understood
> correctly. But I like your framing:
>
> If this is the case, we should called attention to the ITU and APEC. In my
> previous job, we have been even denied observer status in APEC, and the only
> way to get into the meetings was through our national delegations, which I
> have done. The country who object to our observer status was the same
> country that make troubles within the IGF. After a few meetings, we were
> able to get observer status but we have to applied meeting by meeting.
>
>
>
> On 11/10/10 3:24 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>
>> Regarding the reference made to ACTA, I don´t think we are implying that
>> the effective respect for these principles (openness, transparency,
>> accountability, etc) will stop forum shifting. The way I understand, we are
>> simply calling attention to the fact that these principles have been
>> disregarded in other regimes/debates and that a clear message should be sent
>> against this disrespect, by reaffirming these principles and making them the
>> base of our arrangements.
>>
>
>
> --
> Katitza Rodriguez
> International Rights Director
> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> katitza at eff.org
> katitza at datos-personales.org (personal email)
>
> Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom of
> speech since 1990
>
>


-- 
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
FGV Direito Rio

Center for Technology and Society
Getulio Vargas Foundation
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101110/3fea1572/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t