[governance] FINAL? DRAFT statement on enhanced cooperation

[Katitza Rodriguez]

Parminder's intention go far beyond yours, Marilia if I understood 
correctly. But I like your framing:

If this is the case, we should called attention to the ITU and APEC. In 
my previous job, we have been even denied observer status in APEC, and 
the only way to get into the meetings was through our national 
delegations, which I have done. The country who object to our observer 
status was the same country that make troubles within the IGF. After a 
few meetings, we were able to get observer status but we have to applied 
meeting by meeting.


On 11/10/10 3:24 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
> Regarding the reference made to ACTA, I don´t think we are implying 
> that the effective respect for these principles (openness, 
> transparency, accountability, etc) will stop forum shifting. The way I 
> understand, we are simply calling attention to the fact that these 
> principles have been disregarded in other regimes/debates and that a 
> clear message should be sent against this disrespect, by reaffirming 
> these principles and making them the base of our arrangements. 


-- 
Katitza Rodriguez
International Rights Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation
katitza at eff.org
katitza at datos-personales.org (personal email)

Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom of speech since 1990

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t