[governance] FOURTH DRAFT statement on enhanced cooperation

[McTim]

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:
> On 10/11/2010, at 10:03 AM, William Drake wrote:
>
>>>> I think your way of describing might be a bit prejudicial.
>>>> I support the 'do no harm while supporting the existing efforts' clause as defined by McTim.
>>>
>>> +1 to the points above.
>>>
>>> However it should be be there as an option.
>>
>> I agree that the existing efforts should be supported/encouraged and certainly cannot be characterized as "do nothing."
>
> OK, in the next draft will add this back and also massage the language of the "new umbrella governance institution" option as suggested here by Bill.
>
> Any other final suggestions for the version that goes to a consensus call?

Can you answer my query about the "new mandate" language?

>
> --
> Jeremy Malcolm
> Project Coordinator
> Consumers International
> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
> CI is 50
> Consumers International marks 50 years of the global consumer movement in 2010.
> Celebrate with us as we continue to support, promote and protect consumer rights around the world.
> http://www.consumersinternational.org/50
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.
>
>



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t