[governance] Very neutral statement on enhanced cooperation

[JFC Morfin]

At 06:20 03/11/2010, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
>>This definition (also mutually adopted by governments) definitely 
>>conflicts with the Tunis Agenda.
>
>I don't think that the definitions can be reconciled; they are 
>talking about two entirely different processes.

Jeremy,

if you disagree with my premise (that they will eventually be 
reconciled by the interested parties), the shortest statement is that 
we are on planets apart. Hence, if this coalition wants to be more 
than a moon in the governments/users sky, something nobody objects, 
its need to get real first. We are in life, not in procedures. One 
will listen to us if we adequately contribute, not because we have 
the right to speak.

>Whilst it is not entirely coincidental that they use the same term, 
>there is not much that we can learn from the European Community 
>experience.  Just like "open access" means completely different 
>things depending on whether you are talking about content or infrastructure.
>
>I read your interesting email several times, but I'm still not sure 
>exactly what you think we should add to, or change in, the draft 
>statement to cover the points you raise.  Maybe I'm just being 
>dense, but I think if you could restate your proposals much more 
>concisely (like, in a few lines at most) it would make it easier for 
>others to digest them and respond.

As I hinted in talking of a moon in the governance sky, we need to 
change ourselves first if we do not understand what one expects from 
us. There is time to first define our area of responsibility, what 
civil society means, and the legitimacy, pertience and competence it 
gives us to address people's private, civil and public needs.

Sorry if I knocked at the wrong door. My need is for addressing the 
real life impact on public issues of the technology fondamental 
metachange we have obtained (RFC 5890-5895). The important  thing is 
not the metachange (it was implied in the technology) but the 
intergovernmental assessment of what real life should look like from 
their current perspective.

Cheers.
jfc


A reality check, the questions raised by 
http://www.circleid.com/posts/kidnapping_theft_and_rape_are_not_cyber_crimes/



____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t