[governance] Re: ITU IPv6 Event report sought

[Eric Dierker]

I am not reading this right.  Do you mean that "it is for this reason more reports and drafts should be made public" ?
 
Or are you saying we should not know about such things because the vast majority of the public is too stupid.?
 
Or are you saying this made people have to explain themselves and that is bad?
 
Or that no one on the "outside" should know what goes on on the "inside"?
 
(hopefully explaining this is not tooo much trouble)
--- On Thu, 3/18/10, John Curran 


So, a reading of it gives a sense of the meeting, it's important not
to rely on it regarding an specific text.  For example, the charter
of correspondence study group two was a topic of discussion for
more than an hour, and will a barely recognizable derivative of 
what's presently shown.  It's for this reason that draft documents
like these are generally not published outside of the study group
members.


FYI,
/John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100318/f930629c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t