[governance] Parminder's exchange with Bertrand

[Jeanette Hofmann]

Avri Doria wrote:
> On 2 Mar 2010, at 23:42, Parminder wrote:
> 
>> Unless those arguing for MS-ism as the basic new governance form
>> clearly articulate a response to this question, it is difficult to
>> go any further in this discussion.
> 
> 
> I would argue for it, but it does not seem worth doing so in this
> antagonistic atmosphere. 

I whole-heartedly agree. I stopped participating in this discussion when 
the question as to whether global governance should be based on an 
individual or collective notion was derailed towards WW2.

jeanette


  When I find a nice calm situation where I
> can spend several months working out a clear articulation that would
> withstand the aggressive squeeze play attack of Milton & Parminder, I
> will get back to you.  For now I will declare that for me, it is a
> pragmatic matter of realizing it is the only game in town.
> 
> I repeat myself when i say that I think you risk the only chance
> civil society has of having any real participation in Internet
> governance if you and Milton succeed in muddying the waters on
> multistakeholder Internet governance.
> 
> a.
> 
> ____________________________________________________________ You
> received this message as a subscriber on the list: 
> governance at lists.cpsr.org To be removed from the list, send any
> message to: governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see: 
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t