[governance] Parminder's exchange with Bertrand

[Avri Doria]

On 2 Mar 2010, at 23:42, Parminder wrote:

> Unless those arguing for MS-ism as the basic new governance form clearly articulate a response to this question, it is difficult to go any further in this discussion. 


I would argue for it, but it does not seem worth doing so in this antagonistic atmosphere.  When I find a nice calm situation where I can spend several months working out a clear articulation that would withstand the aggressive squeeze play attack of Milton & Parminder, I will get back to you.  For now I will declare that for me, it is a pragmatic matter of realizing it is the only game in town.

I repeat myself when i say that I think you risk the only chance civil society has of having any real participation in Internet governance if you and Milton succeed in muddying the waters on multistakeholder Internet governance.

a.

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t