[governance] [2 of 6] How best to nominate non governmental members
Katitza Rodriguez
katitza at eff.org
Thu Jun 10 15:22:45 EDT 2010
A few more points:
Civil Society has little resources individuals and NGOs (even those NGOs
who has staff) while the other stakeholders has staff with funding to do
their job. Therefore, we need to coordinate more to distribute tasks and
be able to be as effective as the others with the little resources we have.
Communication: I would like to see a more active roles of the
facilitators within the MAG (this can help give directions of the list)
of how to influence and how to participate within this IGF process.
I am afraid that we are creating spaces where civil society might not be
able to be there (due to an honest lack of capacity, etc), and we are
creating some national IGF without the full compositions (or civil
society participation) that is needed.
On 6/10/10 10:54 AM, Katitza Rodriguez wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I would like to make an honest and informal assessment which I have
> been observing as general points in this overall discussion:
>
> 1. I think there is a lack of disparity in "knowledge" and
> "advocacy/lobbying skills" between the business sector/technical
> community and civil society within the MAG. This makes, in my personal
> opinion, civil society representation weak within the MAG (and it
> looks like we have less people that other constituencies).
>
> 2. While I do agree that anyone can represent the overall civil
> society, there are ways where we can organize ourselves. Those civil
> society members who are interested to participate in the meeting and
> are not IGC members can contact the Secretariat, and then the
> Secretariat can forward them to us. If they want to be count in the
> election, those persons can submit their nomination through this
> umbrella organization. Therefore, we can truly assess not only the
> diversity, gender balance but also take into account if we have the
> right composition in terms of knowledge to take care of all this
> issues. FYI: IGC had previously choose IGC reps that are members and
> non members as long as they are civil society so it has had an
> inclusive views in the way the selected their representative.
>
> 3. Be in the MAG can take you lot of hours of works if you want to
> meaningful contribution but also you can do a meaningful contribution
> as a participant if you are able to attend the open consultations.
> More of the work is done there (and then by email following up those
> discussions and within those who were present in the meeting). If you
> are not aware of the dynamics (that usually changes), you can be lost
> in the process.
>
> If you truly want to take care of the issues (freedom of expression,
> privacy, due process, etc etc etc), then you need to be very active
> because the process is made in the moment and if you get lost.. .then
> it is much difficult to influence the outcome.
>
> Finally, I think the Secretariat have try to make a fair assessment of
> the selection of those representative who were not selected by IGC in
> order to have a broader civil society representation.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6/10/10 5:42 AM, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>> Hi, b does not offer a workable solution because the caucus is not
>> the global representative of civil society in the field of Internet
>> governance. After years and years of this debate it would be really
>> good if we could come to terms with the fact that people choose
>> different avenues for applying for a seat on the MAG. If we want to
>> suggest new ways of selecting members, we need to take into
>> consideration that the IGC is not and will not be the center of the
>> civil society world.
>>
>> jeanette
>>
>> Eric Dierker wrote:
>>> Jeremy,
>>>
>>> I like b. We have seen throughout the last century several classic
>>> attempts to incorporate a "member of the party" electoral process.
>>> So often countries claimed elections were open and honest and in
>>> fact had huge turnouts. But you could only vote for a "party
>>> candidate". Too often US and UK elections reach the same result and
>>> there is a constant revolt against the notion.
>>>
>>> Of course I hope this is consistent with my view that the (that is
>>> we*) play a more influencial role. That open, well supervised,
>>> public forum lists be the genesis for more input. That consensus
>>> play a role but that minority views be given weight so that the
>>> majority conclusions can be more pure and less watered down.
>>>
>>> So I think we should keep nominations open open open for those with
>>> a proven desire for public service (like Ginger and Jeremy).
>>>
>>>
>>> * I appreciate very much using this concept as descriptive of the
>>> IGC. It is what is mostly desired to be achieved and I think */we/*
>>> do a good job of it.
>>>
>>> --- On *Tue, 6/8/10, Jeremy Malcolm /<jeremy at ciroap.org>/* wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org>
>>> Subject: [governance] [2 of 6] How best to nominate non
>>> governmental
>>> members for the MAG?
>>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>> Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 4:26 AM
>>>
>>> Continuing the questions from the MAG questionnaire
>>> (http://intgovforum.org/cms/the-preparatory-process/510), comes the
>>> second question:
>>>
>>> *How best to nominate non governmental members for the MAG?*
>>>
>>> Some options are:
>>>
>>> (a) The existing "black box" approach whereby the United Nations
>>> Secretary General selects from a range of nominees put forward by
>>> various parties - selection criteria are not publicly available.
>>>
>>> (b) The IGC (that is, we) could choose, based on certain selection
>>> criteria to ensure diversity etc, that are currently within the
>>> "black box" but would be made public.
>>>
>>> (c) A new nominating committee, selected from a pool of civil
>>> society volunteers, could put forward candidates based on the
>>> selection criteria - similar to what we do internally in the IGC,
>>> and also used by other IG institutions such as the IETF.
>>>
>>> (d) Another civil society umbrella group could nominate them. This
>>> could be the WSIS Civil Society Plenary (which no longer really
>>> exists, but it may be necessary to re-form it before 2015), or an
>>> entirely new peak body.
>>>
>>> Which of these options do you prefer? Can you think of others?
>>> --
>>> *Jeremy Malcolm
>>> Project Coordinator*
>>> Consumers International
>>> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
>>> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala
>>> Lumpur, Malaysia
>>> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>>>
>>> *CI is 50*
>>> Consumers International marks 50 years of the global consumer
>>> movement in 2010.
>>> Celebrate with us as we continue to support, promote and protect
>>> consumer rights around the world.
>>> _http://www.consumersinternational.org/50_
>>>
>>> Read our email confidentiality notice
>>> <http://www.consumersinternational.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=100521&int1stParentNodeID=89765>.
>>>
>>> Don't print this email unless necessary.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>> <http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org>
>>>
>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>> <http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>>
>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
--
Katitza Rodriguez
International Rights Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation
katitza at eff.org
katitza at datos-personales.org (personal email)
Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom of speech since 1990
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list