[governance] Less than 10% of IPv4 Addresses Remain

[McTim]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Eric Dierker
<cogitoergosum at sbcglobal.net>wrote:

> The only error that was made here was the assumption that developed nations
> were in control and controlling these things.  It is more accurately a
> closed club of globetrotting elitist carpetbaggers that control these
> things.
>

If you participated, you would know how wrong you are.


>   The right to speak may in some way be tolerated.  But there is no way a
> right for individuals in the civil society to be heard
>

Everyone has the same opportunity and each voice is given the same weight.
Now, if what you say makes sense, then perhaps people will give your voice
more consideration.



> or have a vote.
>

Voting isn't done, decisions are reached by consensus.



> Even on this list, if Ginger is offended you are cut off.
>

Can you give an example of this?



> Of course at ApNic it is not tolerated to be a non-cadre member.
>

You know not of which you speak.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100122/08a87808/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t