[governance] Less than 10% of IPv4 Addresses Remain

[Eric Dierker]

The only error that was made here was the assumption that developed nations were in control and controlling these things.  It is more accurately a closed club of globetrotting elitist carpetbaggers that control these things.  The right to speak may in some way be tolerated.  But there is no way a right for individuals in the civil society to be heard or have a vote. Even on this list, if Ginger is offended you are cut off.  Of course at ApNic it is not tolerated to be a non-cadre member.


--- On Fri, 1/22/10, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:


Individuals pay what the ISPs decide the market will support.


>The perception you shared is what is commonly shared amongst the
>Internet community from the developed world. Its not an apple pie for
>us, really, we have some really tough problems here.


I think you are wrong. And McTim works in 
developing countries building networks with the 
resources you're talking about. I think he thinks 
you're wrong too.

Adam



>Its not how critically we think but what resources we have access to
>without Moolah (money) in between. The system is very vague indeed for
>the people that see it from outside but from the inside, you pay, you
>get.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100122/e9303ff8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t