[governance] IGC statement REVISION 3.0: consensus call comes

[Katitza Rodriguez]

Greetings:

Can someone explain me the ITU-IGF tension? I do not follow ITU.

Thanks.


On Jan 21, 2010, at 11:42 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote:

> My constructive dissection:
>
>> None of these suggestions would fundamentally alter the IGF as an  
>> institution;
> for example, we are content that it remain formally convened by the UN
> Secretary General, with an independent budget and a Secretariat  
> under contract
> with the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs  
> (UNDESA).  We
> do not see any benefit to the IGF in moving underneath a different  
> UN body.
>
> I take it that: "... We do not see any benefit to the IGF in moving  
> underneath
> a different UN body. ..." addresses the ITU's position.
> Myself, I see no insult in addressing the ITU's position more  
> directly. (Spit
> it out)
>
> Add something like this: And it is genraly felt that if the IGF is  
> to be
> subsumed by the ITU, then IGC members would prefer the IGF remain  
> independent
> of the UN umbrella.
>
> I am suggesting to leave open 'The-Thought' of an Independent IGF  
> for serval
> reasons,
> 1. There may be Other UN Branches (Other than the ITU) that want to  
> hose the
> IGF
> 2. It may be that the IGF can be Independent and 'First among  
> Equals' (among
> all the UN Branches) in respect to Internet Policy, underwritten by  
> the MDG and
> WSIS Declarations.
> 3. if the IGF is in fact slated to conclude, the statement  
> establishes the
> IGC's commitment to the IGF's ongoing Independence.
> ...
> Don't be Shy, the Chair at the ITU certainly is not. Give them (Dese  
> & Markus)
> the fuel to fight.
> I don't feel you'll insult anyone by being Frank & Direct, in fact  
> now is the
> time to do just that, the delicate 'Modalities' as Bertrand de La  
> Chapelle puts
> it can come later.
>
> Else where in your statement, you should add something a-kin too  
> "Piercing the
> corporate Veil", that is make reference to the 'Invisibility' of the  
> UN
> Umbrella Insider negotiations (UN inside modalities) regarding the
> determination of the IGF's composition, that should be made real- 
> time and
> transparent to All.
>
> I use the 'Piercing the corporate Veil' analogy because I feel They  
> (the
> UNSG/UNDESA/ITU/IGF Chairs) have broken their contract with US, in  
> regards to
> Transparency of the final negotiations. Last Year's transactions/ 
> actions were
> evidence of the fact.
> ---
>
> * Piercing the corporate Veil
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing_the_corporate_veil
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t