[governance] IGC statement REVISION 2.0: Para one

[Katitza Rodriguez]

No. My point is a legal one.

On Jan 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote:

> Katiza's objection to McTim's revised statement stems from a fear  
> that an independent IGF wouldn't uphold human rights on the  
> Internet. Is this a valid assumption?
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100117/f2898a57/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t