<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">No. My point is a legal one.<div><br><div><div>On Jan 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(153, 102, 51); font-family: verdana, sans-serif; font-size: small; "><div>Katiza's objection to McTim's revised statement stems from a fear that an independent IGF wouldn't uphold human rights on the Internet. Is this a valid assumption?</div></span></span><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>