[governance] Round III - 15 from non-gov stakeholders 5+5+5

Marilia Maciel mariliamaciel at gmail.com
Fri Dec 17 12:24:38 EST 2010


Was there a wrap up?
What is going on?

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Izumi AIZU <aizu at anr.org> wrote:

> [The show goes on] - after the following, the secretariat is going to
> compile two proposals and put them onto the screen - five minutes
> break.
>
>
> Canada, still confused – and like the UK/Tunisia proposal
>
> Chair
> Proposal on the floor is what UK read.
> My proposal of 5+5+5+ 5 IGO is still there
>
> Philippines
> Seek for clarification
> We can go along with proposal of Iran, but not with UK/Tunisia
>
> India
> Support the Iranian proposal
> Re numbers – there has to be balance between states and other stakeholders
> 3+3+3+3
> We will have difficulty with UK proposal –
> Stakeholders on equal footing on
> Clarify this is the WG of the Chair
> But the report will be that of CSTD
>
> APC
> Express concern the numbering proposal, from Iran and India
> We fail to understand how to include developing countries with that numbers
> I do support the Iran to support the developing countries participation
> Status of WG and output – it appears
> Two resolutions in General Assembly and ECOSOC
> WG Output is the input to CSTD, and then make recommendations to CSTD
> Para 18 of second committee reads as:
>  Welcomes ECOSOC resolution para 30 to invite Chair –
>  <read through>
>
> South Africa
> We support proposal by Iran on Chapeau
> WG 20+2 - already established
> We can increase the numbers into 2, but not accept the language of UK
> proposal
> There should be the distinction – between government and other
> stakeholders and Iran proposal captures
>
> Chair
> Go back to 5+5+5 plus IGO
> I invite UK to polish up
>
> UK
>
>
>
>
> Chair, I will invite UK to table resolution
>
> “The Chair of the CSTD decides on an exceptional basis and without
> prejudice to the rules of the procedure of the function of the
> commission and the ECOSOC, to establish the Working Group which would
> seek, compile and review inputs from all member states and all of the
> stakeholders on improvement of IGF, in open and inclusive manner
> throughout the process, composed the following”
>
> Chair
> Participation of non-governmental entities, civil society – for development
> At 19 July, ECOSOC calling 2006/42, on 28 July 2008, and resolution of
> 18 July 2008, in recognizing the need for meaningful participation and
> contributions for civil society,
> Madam Chair, trying to bring this meeting to consensus – I appeal to
> all of us – this morning and afternoon – to build the consensus and
> trust – that Chair decide on exceptional basis without prejudice
>
> The Chair of CSTD decides as a proposal,
>
> “The Chair of CSTD invites the following stakeholders on an
> exceptional basis without prejudice to the established rules of ECOSOC
> – to establish a Working Group which would seek, compile and review
> inputs from all member states and all of the stakeholders on
> improvement of IGF 5 from CS, 5 from business, 5 from technical and
> academia and International organizations.
>
> Egypt
> I am confused with all proposals.
>
> Chair
> These will be in addition to governments
>
> Egypt
> Normally, at CSTD, those stakeholders are only allowed when invited by
> the Chair to speak? Is this the way?
>
> Chair
> Within the established rule of ECOSOC and CSTD
>
> Egypt
> If they are going to work with established rules, then no need to add? 105?
>
> Chair
> We have 20+ 2 and 15 plus International organization
>
> India
> I want to request if the proposal be read again
>
> Chair
> Proposals are almost identical – not much difference
> We need to compile two together
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>



-- 
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
FGV Direito Rio

Center for Technology and Society
Getulio Vargas Foundation
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101217/cae63363/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list