[governance] Round III - 15 from non-gov stakeholders 5+5+5

[Izumi AIZU]

[The show goes on] - after the following, the secretariat is going to
compile two proposals and put them onto the screen - five minutes
break.


Canada, still confused – and like the UK/Tunisia proposal

Chair
Proposal on the floor is what UK read.
My proposal of 5+5+5+ 5 IGO is still there

Philippines
Seek for clarification
We can go along with proposal of Iran, but not with UK/Tunisia

India
Support the Iranian proposal
Re numbers – there has to be balance between states and other stakeholders
3+3+3+3
We will have difficulty with UK proposal –
Stakeholders on equal footing on
Clarify this is the WG of the Chair
But the report will be that of CSTD

APC
Express concern the numbering proposal, from Iran and India
We fail to understand how to include developing countries with that numbers
I do support the Iran to support the developing countries participation
Status of WG and output – it appears
Two resolutions in General Assembly and ECOSOC
WG Output is the input to CSTD, and then make recommendations to CSTD
Para 18 of second committee reads as:
 Welcomes ECOSOC resolution para 30 to invite Chair –
 <read through>

South Africa
We support proposal by Iran on Chapeau
WG 20+2 - already established
We can increase the numbers into 2, but not accept the language of UK proposal
There should be the distinction – between government and other
stakeholders and Iran proposal captures

Chair
Go back to 5+5+5 plus IGO
I invite UK to polish up

UK




Chair, I will invite UK to table resolution

“The Chair of the CSTD decides on an exceptional basis and without
prejudice to the rules of the procedure of the function of the
commission and the ECOSOC, to establish the Working Group which would
seek, compile and review inputs from all member states and all of the
stakeholders on improvement of IGF, in open and inclusive manner
throughout the process, composed the following”

Chair
Participation of non-governmental entities, civil society – for development
At 19 July, ECOSOC calling 2006/42, on 28 July 2008, and resolution of
18 July 2008, in recognizing the need for meaningful participation and
contributions for civil society,
Madam Chair, trying to bring this meeting to consensus – I appeal to
all of us – this morning and afternoon – to build the consensus and
trust – that Chair decide on exceptional basis without prejudice

The Chair of CSTD decides as a proposal,

“The Chair of CSTD invites the following stakeholders on an
exceptional basis without prejudice to the established rules of ECOSOC
– to establish a Working Group which would seek, compile and review
inputs from all member states and all of the stakeholders on
improvement of IGF 5 from CS, 5 from business, 5 from technical and
academia and International organizations.

Egypt
I am confused with all proposals.

Chair
These will be in addition to governments

Egypt
Normally, at CSTD, those stakeholders are only allowed when invited by
the Chair to speak? Is this the way?

Chair
Within the established rule of ECOSOC and CSTD

Egypt
If they are going to work with established rules, then no need to add? 105?

Chair
We have 20+ 2 and 15 plus International organization

India
I want to request if the proposal be read again

Chair
Proposals are almost identical – not much difference
We need to compile two together
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t