[governance] EC consultation in NY: my report

[Louis Pouzin (well)]

Hi Izumi,

It seems unlikely that the UN position on the IGF WG will change in the near
future. Then CS will have to settle for an opportunist approach. Possible
tactics:

- Contact chair of the WG on IGF improvement.
- Ask where and when the WG will meet.
- Ask how MSH may provide "inputs".
- Later, request F2F special MSH WG sessions for input clarifications.

Writing to the SG may be an option, more iffy IMHO.
- - -

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:

> Taking off my coordinator hat, I think there is another option:
>
> Still trying to make EC consultation process also as multi-stakeholder,
> in view of, if any, EC WG or something created, it should be
> MSH we should stick to.
>
> That does not mean to consider empowering IGF including the
> possible option of making recommendations or reports, etc.
> something similar to, perhaps, WGIG kind of exercise.
>
> As Milton indicated, just saying the status quo is working fine
> and no change needed, in the context of "IGF improvement"
> and "enhanced" cooperation, is rather weak, IMHO.
>
> my 2 cents,
>
> izumi
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101217/0637d242/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t