RES: [governance] Review Panels

[Vanda UOL]

I also had written to him with the same invitation.. 

 

De: carlton.samuels at gmail.com [mailto:carlton.samuels at gmail.com] Em nome de
Carlton Samuels
Enviada em: sábado, 17 de outubro de 2009 13:21
Para: governance at lists.cpsr.org; jfcallo at isocperu.org
Assunto: Re: [governance] Review Panels

 

Dear Jose:

There is an ICANN At-Large community that might suit your purpose. See
http://www.atlarge.icann.org/.  Under the At-Large umbrella, the regional
organisation, LACRALO, may serve as your point of connection - see 

 

https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi - and there are opportunities for
membership.   Since they are already members of LACRALO, your ISOC brethren
in Argentina and Mexico may be helpful in advising you.

 

Kind regards,

Carlton Samuels

LACRALO, Jamaica 

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:39 PM, <jfcallo at isocperu.org> wrote:

Distinguished members of this list:
I write from Lima, Peru, we are interested in participating in ICANN,
contribute from our experience, how do to connect with ICANN?, Send an
e-mail for 10 days and no one responds.
Thanks
Jose F. Callo Romero
   Secretario
   ISOC Peru




Quoting Danny Younger <dannyyounger at yahoo.com>:

Bertrand,
 
There is more to this equation than diversity, balance, and
representativeness; these review panels will require individuals  with
extensive knowledge regarding the particulars of the areas  under review
(which is why independent experts are cited as part of  the necessary review
team mix).

The teams will include:
 
the Chair of the GAC
the CEO of ICANN
representatives of the Root Server System Advisory Committee
representatives of the Security and Stability Advisory Committee
representatives of the At-Large Advisory Committee
representatives of the Generic Names Supporting Organization
representatives of the Address Supporting Organization
representatives of the Country Code Names Supporting Organization
independent experts (likely drawn from either the Technical Liason  Group,
the IETF, the IAB, or from the pool of volunteer community  members)
 
and in the accountability/transparency review team, these members  will be
joined by the Assistant Secretary for Communications and  Information of the
DOC,
 
The current arrangement calls for the composition of the review team to be
agreed jointly by the Chair of the GAC (in consultation with GAC members)
and the CEO of ICANN.
 
Like all comparable ICANN processes, there will likely be a call for
volunteers (similar to the recent call for NSCG placeholder councilors).
The ICANN Board will then privately settle upon whomever best promotes the
ICANN interest (likely those that have never been critics) and will then
advance those names to the Chair of the GAC.
 
I fully expect these reviews to be as much of a whitewash as all earlier
ICANN self-review efforts.  Perhaps you will recall the earlier commissioned
review of transparency and accountability provided in the One World Trust
report -- we were told that ICANN is a model of transparency with robust
accountability mechanisms... and yet we all know the reality.
 
Don't waste your energy on this project.  The deck will be stacked from day
one.
 
best regards,
Danny Younger
 

--- On Thu, 10/15/09, Bertrand de La Chapelle  <bdelachapelle at gmail.com>
wrote:


From: Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com>
Subject: [governance] Review Panels
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org, "Anriette Esterhuysen" <anriette at apc.org>
Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009, 4:33 AM


Dear all,

Could this list also address Anriette's concrete second question ?  What do
you think the review process should be ? Fundamentally, the  community is
facing a now recurring problem (cf. WGIG, MAG,...) :  how to compose a
multi-stakeholder group for a given task, so that  it is sufficiently
diverse, balanced and representative of the  variety of viewpoints ?

In addition, what do you tink the timing is ?

Best

Bertrand



On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Anriette Esterhuysen  <anriette at apc.org>
wrote:

snip

Second question is about the submissions on the review panels. What is
the process likely to be?

Anriette




--
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the
Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign
and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance








____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
   governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
   governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
   http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20091017/c202d3a9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance