[governance] Review Panels

[Andrés Piazza]

Dear jose,

As carlton says, LACRALO may be an interesting space for you. Since
there are not organisations from Peru in ICANN At Large this is also
great for latin american users.

As LACRALO chair I'm completely available to assist you. Do you remember me?

Regards,

Andres Piazza

2009/10/17, Vanda UOL <vanda at uol.com.br>:
> I also had written to him with the same invitation..
>
>
>
> De: carlton.samuels at gmail.com [mailto:carlton.samuels at gmail.com] Em nome de
> Carlton Samuels
> Enviada em: sábado, 17 de outubro de 2009 13:21
> Para: governance at lists.cpsr.org; jfcallo at isocperu.org
> Assunto: Re: [governance] Review Panels
>
>
>
> Dear Jose:
>
> There is an ICANN At-Large community that might suit your purpose. See
> http://www.atlarge.icann.org/.  Under the At-Large umbrella, the regional
> organisation, LACRALO, may serve as your point of connection - see
>
>
>
> https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi - and there are opportunities for
> membership.   Since they are already members of LACRALO, your ISOC brethren
> in Argentina and Mexico may be helpful in advising you.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Carlton Samuels
>
> LACRALO, Jamaica
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:39 PM, <jfcallo at isocperu.org> wrote:
>
> Distinguished members of this list:
> I write from Lima, Peru, we are interested in participating in ICANN,
> contribute from our experience, how do to connect with ICANN?, Send an
> e-mail for 10 days and no one responds.
> Thanks
> Jose F. Callo Romero
>    Secretario
>    ISOC Peru
>
>
>
>
> Quoting Danny Younger <dannyyounger at yahoo.com>:
>
> Bertrand,
>
> There is more to this equation than diversity, balance, and
> representativeness; these review panels will require individuals  with
> extensive knowledge regarding the particulars of the areas  under review
> (which is why independent experts are cited as part of  the necessary review
> team mix).
>
> The teams will include:
>
> the Chair of the GAC
> the CEO of ICANN
> representatives of the Root Server System Advisory Committee
> representatives of the Security and Stability Advisory Committee
> representatives of the At-Large Advisory Committee
> representatives of the Generic Names Supporting Organization
> representatives of the Address Supporting Organization
> representatives of the Country Code Names Supporting Organization
> independent experts (likely drawn from either the Technical Liason  Group,
> the IETF, the IAB, or from the pool of volunteer community  members)
>
> and in the accountability/transparency review team, these members  will be
> joined by the Assistant Secretary for Communications and  Information of the
> DOC,
>
> The current arrangement calls for the composition of the review team to be
> agreed jointly by the Chair of the GAC (in consultation with GAC members)
> and the CEO of ICANN.
>
> Like all comparable ICANN processes, there will likely be a call for
> volunteers (similar to the recent call for NSCG placeholder councilors).
> The ICANN Board will then privately settle upon whomever best promotes the
> ICANN interest (likely those that have never been critics) and will then
> advance those names to the Chair of the GAC.
>
> I fully expect these reviews to be as much of a whitewash as all earlier
> ICANN self-review efforts.  Perhaps you will recall the earlier commissioned
> review of transparency and accountability provided in the One World Trust
> report -- we were told that ICANN is a model of transparency with robust
> accountability mechanisms... and yet we all know the reality.
>
> Don't waste your energy on this project.  The deck will be stacked from day
> one.
>
> best regards,
> Danny Younger
>
>
> --- On Thu, 10/15/09, Bertrand de La Chapelle  <bdelachapelle at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> From: Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com>
> Subject: [governance] Review Panels
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org, "Anriette Esterhuysen" <anriette at apc.org>
> Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009, 4:33 AM
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Could this list also address Anriette's concrete second question ?  What do
> you think the review process should be ? Fundamentally, the  community is
> facing a now recurring problem (cf. WGIG, MAG,...) :  how to compose a
> multi-stakeholder group for a given task, so that  it is sufficiently
> diverse, balanced and representative of the  variety of viewpoints ?
>
> In addition, what do you tink the timing is ?
>
> Best
>
> Bertrand
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Anriette Esterhuysen  <anriette at apc.org>
> wrote:
>
> snip
>
> Second question is about the submissions on the review panels. What is
> the process likely to be?
>
> Anriette
>
>
>
>
> --
> ____________________
> Bertrand de La Chapelle
> Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the
> Information Society
> Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign
> and European Affairs
> Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32
>
> "Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
> Exupéry
> ("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>    governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>    governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
>
>

-- 
Enviado desde mi dispositivo móvil
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance