[governance] Review Panels

[Bertrand de La Chapelle]

Dear all,

Could this list also address Anriette's concrete second question ? What do
you think the review process should be ? Fundamentally, the community is
facing a now recurring problem (cf. WGIG, MAG,...) : how to compose a
multi-stakeholder group for a given task, so that it is sufficiently
diverse, balanced and representative of the variety of viewpoints ?

In addition, what do you tink the timing is ?

Best

Bertrand


On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org>wrote:

> snip
>
> Second question is about the submissions on the review panels. What is
> the process likely to be?
>
> Anriette
>
>
>

-- 
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the
Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign
and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20091015/7ca86294/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance