[governance] JPA response - second draft for comments

[Adam Peake]

At 2:39 PM +0200 5/29/09, William Drake wrote:
>Hi Ian,
>
>On May 29, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Ian Peter wrote:
>
>>Hi Anriette,
>>
>>I still believe that the JPA can be ended, subject to ICANN agreeing to
>>certain binding conditions. That I think is a far preferable arrangement if
>>it can happen.
>
>Among whom would the binding conditions be agreed?  In what form? 
>How would their implementation be monitored and assessed?  What 
>consequences would flow from failure to implement?  And so 
>on...we're not going to get consensus on a statement that's based on 
>abstractions and leaps of faith.  What's really needed is some 
>serious brainstorming on 3.0 architectural options that are 
>responsive to what goes on within the organization and to the 
>growing intergovernmental machinations outside of it (witness this 
>week's CSTD meeting etc).


What machinations were these?  Could you summarize?

Thanks,

Adam




>Can we do this before June 8?
>
>Bill
>
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
>For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance