AW: AW: [governance] JPA

[Carlos Afonso]

Yes, my intention is never to abandon the slice-by-slice principle :)
but to make sure a strategy is built taking into account everything
which is involved -- ie, think of the immediate JPA process, OK, but
recalling that ties will remain and how far the "independence" of a
JPA-less Icann can go.

Cut slice-by-slice, but thinking always of all the slices as a whole ;)

--c.a.

McTim wrote:
> FYI,
> 
> Verisign also wants a delay.... read into it what you will.
> 
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/comments/2009/dnstransition/003.pdf
> 
> "The discussion included VeriSign interests in seeing the JPA extended
> for an additional year to help facilitate an appeals mechanism with
> the potential departure of the Department of Commerce’s JPA review and
> the need for oversight of the decision making process to ensure
> accountability and transparency through out the entire ICANN process."
> 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance