AW: AW: [governance] JPA

[Ian Peter]

On 28/05/09 12:22 PM, "Carlos Afonso" <ca at rits.org.br> wrote:

> So, in a post-JPA world, modifications in the root zone file will
> continue to require the imprimatur of the NTIA priests. Shouldn't we be
> discussing the whole thing, or will we be happy with the end of the JPA
> alone?
> 
> --c.a.

The immediate call for comments is as regards JPA, and that is probably all
we can address in this reply.


> 
> Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> One word: Nothing
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Carlos Afonso [mailto:ca at rits.org.br]
>>> 
>>> Trying to understand exactly where we are and what would really be
>>> achieved by the end of the JPA... One question: with the end
>>> (for good) of the JPA, what would happen with the IANA USDoC/ICANN
>>> contract and the CRADA agreement?
>>> 
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>> 
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> 
>> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance