[governance] China: "we don't agree that the IGF should continue"

[Fouad Bajwa]

Good answer Roland!

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Roland Perry
<roland at internetpolicyagency.com> wrote:
> In message <701af9f70905150353iefa393fq50a3b33117919290 at mail.gmail.com>, at
> 17:53:18 on Fri, 15 May 2009, Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa at gmail.com> writes
>>
>> Being in the open consultation, I would like to elaborate just for the
>> sake of it that there is a political process behind the understanding
>> of an IGF and the countries do take the final decision at the UN
>> general assembly and I doubt that any of these statements reflect the
>> final decision of the general assembly that takes the vote of all its
>> member countries.
>
> The member countries will be voting on a recommendation from the Secretary
> General, which has previously been passed by CSTD/ECOSOC.
>
> How often do such recommendations get reversed in General Assembly (a
> genuine question)?
> --
> Roland Perry
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>    governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>    governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>



-- 

Regards.
--------------------------
Fouad Bajwa
@skBajwa
Answering all your technology questions
http://www.askbajwa.com
http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance