[governance] China: "we don't agree that the IGF should continue"
Roland Perry
roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Fri May 15 09:04:52 EDT 2009
In message <701af9f70905150353iefa393fq50a3b33117919290 at mail.gmail.com>,
at 17:53:18 on Fri, 15 May 2009, Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa at gmail.com>
writes
>Being in the open consultation, I would like to elaborate just for the
>sake of it that there is a political process behind the understanding
>of an IGF and the countries do take the final decision at the UN
>general assembly and I doubt that any of these statements reflect the
>final decision of the general assembly that takes the vote of all its
>member countries.
The member countries will be voting on a recommendation from the
Secretary General, which has previously been passed by CSTD/ECOSOC.
How often do such recommendations get reversed in General Assembly (a
genuine question)?
--
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list