[governance] JPA response - second draft for comments
Carlos Afonso
ca at rits.org.br
Fri May 29 20:56:47 EDT 2009
Bill, there is a huge distance here between what is really needed (a
fully conceived and detailed 3.0 architectural blablabla) and what we
can do in this very diverse, asynchronous, voluntary forum. Not that we
should not make the effort, of course, but there are already clear hints
in the current text at to what these binding conditions might be -- the
multistakeholder principle etc etc.
--c.a.
William Drake wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On May 29, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Ian Peter wrote:
>
>> Hi Anriette,
>>
>> I still believe that the JPA can be ended, subject to ICANN agreeing to
>> certain binding conditions. That I think is a far preferable
>> arrangement if
>> it can happen.
>
> Among whom would the binding conditions be agreed? In what form? How
> would their implementation be monitored and assessed? What consequences
> would flow from failure to implement? And so on...we're not going to
> get consensus on a statement that's based on abstractions and leaps of
> faith. What's really needed is some serious brainstorming on 3.0
> architectural options that are responsive to what goes on within the
> organization and to the growing intergovernmental machinations outside
> of it (witness this week's CSTD meeting etc). Can we do this before
> June 8?
>
> Bill
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list