[governance] open consultations and MAG meeting

Meryem Marzouki marzouki at ras.eu.org
Mon Mar 2 10:38:16 EST 2009


Le 2 mars 09 à 16:21, Roland Perry a écrit :
> The theme that I took away from the public meetings last week was  
> that the IGF should work in those areas where an existing worldwide  
> *solution* to a governance "issue" isn't already covered. As far as  
> I know, for example, there isn't a worldwide anti-spam or anti- 
> phishing agency, so that would be within remit to discuss and  
> attempt to combine existing knowledge and skills.

There is, e.g., the London Action Plan (http:// 
www.londonactionplan.org/), which describes itself as "international  
spam enforcement network". Not to mention that UN agencies and other  
arenas are also working on these issues.

And if there is an issue which is addressed at all levels and  
everywhere, it is indeed "child protection". Yet, if I've well  
understood, the IGF is eager to address it, and on top of this has  
the 'sentiment' that it has now 'matured' in IGF circles.____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list