[governance] open consultations and MAG meeting
Meryem Marzouki
marzouki at ras.eu.org
Mon Mar 2 10:38:16 EST 2009
Le 2 mars 09 à 16:21, Roland Perry a écrit :
> The theme that I took away from the public meetings last week was
> that the IGF should work in those areas where an existing worldwide
> *solution* to a governance "issue" isn't already covered. As far as
> I know, for example, there isn't a worldwide anti-spam or anti-
> phishing agency, so that would be within remit to discuss and
> attempt to combine existing knowledge and skills.
There is, e.g., the London Action Plan (http://
www.londonactionplan.org/), which describes itself as "international
spam enforcement network". Not to mention that UN agencies and other
arenas are also working on these issues.
And if there is an issue which is addressed at all levels and
everywhere, it is indeed "child protection". Yet, if I've well
understood, the IGF is eager to address it, and on top of this has
the 'sentiment' that it has now 'matured' in IGF circles.____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list