[governance] JPA - final draft for comments

[McTim]

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Carlos Afonso <ca at rits.org.br> wrote:
> McT, I could not grasp one of your suggestions:


>
> McTim wrote:
>> nice one Ian,
>> My suggested changes below:
>> [...]
>>
>> multistakeholder principle
>>> which has evolved from
>>
>> <insert>
>> the narrow Internet Governance model to it's meaning derived from the
>>
>> the World Summit on the Information Society and the
>>> Internet  Governance Forum process which the US Government has supported,
>>> and which is  an important facet, we believe, of effective internet
>>> governance  arrangements. We also speak more about principles in answer to
>>> your Q7 below.
>
> I do not understand what is to be inserted where. As I read it, the
> phrase to be inserted would be "the narrow Internet Governance model to
> its [not it's] meaning derived from the..."
>
> Please clarify.

it would read thusly:


IGC believes these principles are important, and would like to see
them embedded in the bylaws of an independent ICANN. We would propose
to
replace "private sector management" with the
words "multistakeholder management" which has evolved from the narrow
Internet Governance model to it's meaning derived from the the World
Summit on the Information Society and the Internet  Governance Forum
process which the US Government has supported,
and which is  an important facet, we believe, of effective internet
governance arrangements.

The above acknowledges that there was multistakeholderism b4 WSIS, that's all.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance