[Fwd: [governance] Workshop proposal - Internationalisation of

[Garth Graham]

If the principles are agreed, then why not begin with them?  How  
about "Sustaining collaborative self-organization in Internet  
Governance?"  Or maybe as per Vint Cerf, "Sustaining collaborative  
ecologies in Internet Governance?"

On 21-Apr-09, at 1:52 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> great points, Garth. Which is why I proposed "transnational" -- as  
> in "transcending" the national. I don't see how that word implies a  
> closed and absolute system of political authority. But if you do  
> think it does, what's the alternative?
>
> Milton Mueller
> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
> ------------------------------
> Internet Governance Project:
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>> relationships.  All three of those words are hierarchical, and
>> therefore move  Internet governance out of the frying pan of first
>> principles about open relational choice and into the fire of closed
>> and absolute systems of political authority.  Political governance
>> that does not acknowledge a shift towards relational self-
>> organization as a different approach to governance is not
>> going to be
>> good Internet Governance.  To put that another way, does anybody
>> believe that "world" government can be "accountable political
>> governance?"

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance