Fw: [governance] Fw: Policy manoeuvres around a European IGF
jlfullsack
jlfullsack at wanadoo.fr
Thu Apr 9 16:37:41 EDT 2009
Sorry , I missed the programme of the Public hearing.
Here it is
PUBLIC HEARING
"An Internet Governance Forum for Europe?"
European Parliament
Wednesday, 15 April 2009
16.00 - 18.30
ROOM: ASP 3G3
Interpretation available: FR, DE, EN, ES
Programme
16.00 - 16.10 Welcome Speech by Gunnar Hökmark, MEP
1st Panel chaired by Catherine Trautmann, Vice-President ITRE Committee
16.10 - 16.20 Torbjørn Frøysnes
Director of the Liaison Office of the Council of Europe with European Institutions and Special Representative of the Secretary General
16.20 - 16.30 Martin Boyle
Senior Policy Advisor, Nominet
16.30 - 16.40 Eugenio Triana
International Management Consultant on telecom policy, space and satellite systems, copyright and intellectual property rights (ICANN Initial Board of Directors)
16.40 - 17.10 Q&A and discussion
2nd Panel chaired by Pilar Del Castillo Vera, MEP
17.15 - 17.25 Patrik Fältström
Member of the board of Swedish Networks User Society
17.25 - 17.35 Christopher Wilkinson
ISOC-ECC Board Members, European Chapters Coordinating Council,
ISOC-Belgium-Wallonie
17.35 - 17.45 Nicklas Lundblad
European Policy Manager, Google
17.45 - 18.15 Q&A and discussion
18.15 - 18.30 Conclusions
Catherine Trautmann
Vice-President ITRE Committee
----- Original Message -----
From: jlfullsack
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 12:31 AM
Subject: [governance] Fw: Policy manoeuvres around a European IGF
For your information
----- Original Message -----
From: jlfullsack
To: WSIS CS WG on Information Networks Governance ; Caucus Europe
Cc: Catherine Trautmann
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:42 PM
Subject: Policy manoeuvres around a European IGF
Dear all
The above event announcement that was sent yesterday raises some serious concerns in my opinion.
The European IGF is pending since January 2008 when it was announced and unanimously adopted by the European Parliament in Strasbourg (see my report on this session sent to the euc list). Since nothing happened in the meantime, EuroDig -launched by some of our colleagues with the strong support of the Council of Europe in October 2008- questioned the two MEPs attending the meeting about the urgent necessity for -at last- setting up this European IGF as proposed by the final documents of the WSIS (i.e. multistakeholder based and open to CS). Both Catherine Trautmann and Malcolm Harbour gave their strong support to that.
The "hearing" in Brussels mentioned below is likely to be the response of the EU Commission to our concerns.
However it is very far from the European CS expectations for a couple of reasons, and therefore unacceptable for us. Among these reasons :
First : It is published just one week before the meeting, thus placing CS organisations concerned before a "fait accompli", and therefore unable to prepare the meeting and coordinate different organisations for a fruitful participation.
Second : There won't be any representative of the European CS in the discussion panels. In fact, these are organised "around" private sector speakers. Patrik Faltstrom who is alternatively a manager at Cisco, a representative of the Swedish government or a NGO member (as chair or something like of a Swedish ICT users organisation), depending on the nature of the meeting, definitely isn't a CS representative !
Third : Restricting the role of the European CS, who is engaged in the WSIS process since its very beginning, to just being a possible single answerer to the EC or EP selected questions during a couple of minutes, is an obvious sign of contempt for all of its organisations and members. Moreover, this attitude of the Commission (with or without the EP's support) strongly infringes the framework and the procedures based on multistakeholder principles edicted by the WSIS and agreed on by all European governments in Tunis.
At last, I'd kindly ask our politicians in Brussels to draw their inspiration from the sub-regional African IGFs which are organized and are working as asked for by the WSIS. I suggest them to ask their African counterparts for some advice and help. In the framework of the EU-ACP Agreement for instance.
For all these reasons, I strongly ask EU CS to boycott such a meeting.
All the best
Jean-Louis Fullsack
CSDPTT
Focal person to the EP of the European CS accredited to the WSIS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20090409/6f17153a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: message-footer.txt
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20090409/6f17153a/attachment.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list