[governance] Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Copyright Cops

Jeffrey A. Williams jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Fri Sep 12 10:07:20 EDT 2008


All,

  Regarding rights, ( This one really bothers me ) see:

"The Senate Judiciary Committee has
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080911-committee-amends-approves-enormous-gift-to-big-content.html

approved the EIPA (the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
Act of 2008), which would create copyright cops. And these cops would
take over the RIAA's War on Sharing by filing civil lawsuits and using
civil forfeiture laws to take any and all computers engaged in
infringement. Worse, they would even seize computers (such as
servers or database farms) that house the data of innocent people, and
these people would not have any right to get their data back. At best
the 'virtual bystanders' who happened to have data on a computer used
for infringement could get a protective order saying that no one should
go
rummaging through their stuff. Perhaps the only good thing in the bill
is that they've excluded DMCA circumvention from the list of grounds for

seizure. So while the Senators believe this is needed to combat foreign
copyright infringement cartels, it's entirely likely that innocent
people will be harmed by this law."

My notes:  Seems to me that sense the RIAA and the MPAA have
been loosing cases all of the country, as have their counterparts in
other countries, this legislation was borne from lobbying of those
IP organizations and their members for extraordinary Rights, in that
they cannot or will not protect their own IP rights in accordance
with current law and available technology.

Comments, thoughts, suggestions?

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list