[governance] Do We Need An Internet Zoning Law?

Jeffrey A. Williams jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Mon Sep 1 07:09:44 EDT 2008


Roland and all,

  Again my response is interspersed below Rolands...

Roland Perry wrote:

> In message <48BB3BEF.A933CB11 at ix.netcom.com>, at 17:48:47 on Sun, 31 Aug
> 2008, Jeffrey A. Williams <jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com> writes
> >Roland and all,
>
> >> >>Who would act if  an illegal strip-club opened in your small town main
> >> >>street?
> >> >
> >> >  The city council would shut it down, I can assure you IF it ever was
> >> >to receive a business license to open such a business in the first
> >> >place.
> >>
> >> I wasn't assuming it ever had a business licence - it's illegal,
> >> remember.
> >
> >  No it's not an illegal business in Texas.  It IS against some city or
> >county ordinances.  The distinction is small admittedly, but distinct.
>
> Forget Texas; the question had a presumption that such a club would be
> illegal in the town under discussion. (If you prefer, pick a different
> business that *would* be illegal in a town of your choice).

  Huh?  What town under discussion?  You lost me there.  Any business
would be illegal IF it didn't have a proper business lic. if one was required.
Different states, as well as municipalities have different legal requirements.

>
>
> >  The Internet is global, ergo borders as far as access are not relevant.
>
> This is about the hosting, the running of the business; not access.

  Ah, ok very different criterion than.  Hosting as to local, again depends
as to legality of content available, on the country and state/province in
which the actual hosting is.  But again, hosting is also irrelevant to a lessor

degree admittedly, as again the access would be global.  Now if you were
talking about an IntrAnet or and ExtrAnet, that where such limited access
domain names are IS or could be relevant depending on how limited those
*networks* were in respect to national boundaries or boarders, AND IF
those DN's were accessible by the public Internet via a gateway server
or other gateway hardware or even software.  My company specializes in
this technology for secure networks for instance...  Another potential and
existing example would be other root servers structures OR additionally
and perhaps separately, but not necessarily so, other non-compatable
for data exchange or transmit, other IP ( as in TCP/IP ) protocols.  IPv9
for instance, * instead of*  IPv4 or IPv6.  Note however:  We have been
working on inter operability of IPv9 too either IPv4 or IPv6.  So even
IPv9 may at some point not be an exception.  Given 64 bit architecture,
it won't be long and no currently known or even experimental IP based
architecture will be *stand alone* operationally or compatibly speaking.

>
>
> --
> Roland Perry
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list