Remote participation plans Re: [OCDC] Re: [governance] Do we

[Ken Lohento]

Hi McTim

McTim a écrit :
> Well, from my experience the IGF webcast/chat functions have been
> unusable. 

You're right, the systems don't always/most of the time work well. (just 
for info, maybe it was already mentioned : for MAG meetings, we often 
use Marratech http://www.marratech.co.uk/ and it works quite well often 
- but I think it's not adequate for public IGF meetings, notably because 
it requires more technical arrangements from the user side).

> Now I recognise that I am not like "most people"

of course, you're not :-)

> 2) I CAN and DO participate remotely in the "existing Internet
> administration bodies" events on this same link.  This is not
> surprising given the amount of experience (RIPE meetings webcast for
> ~5 years, others slightly less) AND the type of NOC they can run on
> site.
>   

It seems to me a crucial issue is that the UN engaged itself more 
decisively in IGF and provide more resources for it's whole management, 
notably to better remote participation.

Best

KL
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance