[governance] Re: Nomcom and conflict of interest

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Ah yes, but given the "usual suspects" nature of this sector, I am sure this
rotation will be rendered moot, sooner or later.

> Also, if you don't agree with the approach taken by this year's
> NomCom, you may take comfort in the knowledge that they will most
> likely be gone when the next panel is randomly selected.  The more
> vociferous the objectors are, presumably the more likely they are to
> put their hands up for the next NomCom, and therefore the more likely
> to find places on it.  (And in the meantime, this is a timely debate
> for us to have for future NomComs' guidance.)



____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance