[governance] Re: Nomcom and conflict of interest
Avri Doria
avri at psg.com
Fri May 23 11:41:51 EDT 2008
On 23 May 2008, at 11:10, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> The more vociferous the objectors are, presumably the more likely
> they are to put their hands up for the next NomCom, and therefore
> the more likely to find places on it.
of course this is true, but there are mitigations.
that is one reason for requiring at least a 5:1 ratio, i.e. 25 names
for 5 picks. of course it would be better to have a larger ratio, as
the larger the ratio the smaller the chance of repetitions (other then
for the influence of the fickle finger of random fate). so as a
measure to help prevent repeats in the nomcom, more people should
volunteer for the lottery.
a.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list