[governance] Re: Nomcom and conflict of interest
Jeremy Malcolm
Jeremy at malcolm.id.au
Fri May 23 11:10:23 EDT 2008
On 23/05/2008, at 10:48 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> Again, a necessary correction: we are not talking about what the IGF
> should do here. We are talking about who _this caucus_ should nominate
> to represent them on the MAG.
>
> The distinction is crucial.
>
> If this caucus doesn't nominate these other stakeholders they have
> plenty of other opportunities to get on the MAG.
Also, if you don't agree with the approach taken by this year's
NomCom, you may take comfort in the knowledge that they will most
likely be gone when the next panel is randomly selected. The more
vociferous the objectors are, presumably the more likely they are to
put their hands up for the next NomCom, and therefore the more likely
to find places on it. (And in the meantime, this is a timely debate
for us to have for future NomComs' guidance.)
--
Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor
host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list