[governance] Please summarize the discussion

Carlos Afonso ca at rits.org.br
Thu Jun 12 11:56:35 EDT 2008


Hmmmm... this confusion happens in part because of the insistence of 
some to characterize the technical community per se as a stakeholder. 
Strange that the nomcom says that of RIRs, at least regarding our 
region. LACNIC (the LA&C RIR) is a non-profit civil society NGO formally 
registered in Uruguay. This is one of the reasons why the LA&C caucus 
accepted Raul Echeberría as a candidate to be indicated by the caucus 
for the MAG -- and he was one of the first three indicated by our 
caucus, as you recall.

frt rgds

--c.a.

Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Summary -
> 
> 1. The nomcom says "technical internet governance institutions" like the
> RIRs are not civil society and not eligible to be nominated as civil society
> by the caucus
> 
> 2. Some of us disagree
> 
> 2a. Some of us also point out something others have pointed out, the nomcomm
> should have checked back with the caucus before taking this kind of
> decision.
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Meryem Marzouki [mailto:marzouki at ras.eu.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:33 AM
>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> Subject: Re: [governance] Please summarize the discussion
>>
>> Agree on the need for a summary. Especially since the discussion
>> risks to be now focused on other issues (programme and close deadlines).
>> Best,
>> Meryem
>>
>> Le 9 juin 08 à 18:50, Carlos Afonso a écrit :
>>
>>> You are not alone, Bertrand. It has become nearly impossible to
>>> follow...
>>>
>>> --c.a.
>>>
>>> Bertrand de La Chapelle wrote:
>>>> Dear Parminder,
>>>> I must confess that - as many people apparently - I have lost
>>>> track of this
>>>> intense debate and having had a few other things to do, I cannot
>>>> find the
>>>> time to read the flurry of - often long - emails it has now
>>>> produced on the
>>>> list.
>>>> As the causus coordinator, could you please, with the help of the
>>>> main
>>>> actors involved if necessary,  summarize briefly the main
>>>> positions and what
>>>> is at stake here ? I'm a bit lost.
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>> Best
>>>> Bertrand
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>>
>>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list