[governance] Reconstituting MAG (Tech/admin language)

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

And where does this particular subset of CS get off demanding that these
organizations marginalize their stake when giving more stake to CS?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:11 AM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Avri Doria
> Subject: RE: [governance] Reconstituting MAG (Tech/admin language)
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at psg.com]
> >
> > Can you point out to me where the IGF secretariat has perceived that
> > entities (word chosen to avoid the current discussion of whether they
> > are IOs or not) such as ICANN, RIR and IETF are CS?
> 
> Formal statements? Of course not, Secretariat bureaucrats are too
> careful for that. So I answer your question with another one: If the
> 9-10 I* organizations are not counted as CS, what are they counted as?
> And where is it stated anywhere what they are counted as? And if they
> are considered a separate "technical community" then by definition
> giving them that status as a stakeholder group on a par with CS reduces
> the number of CS people on the MAG, does it not?
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance