[governance] Themes for the coming IGFs

[shaila mistry]

Yes ultimately it comes down to Public Policy . This need to be given stronger billing and a greater role for the CS in this respect
Shaila Rao Mistry
 

________________________________
From: Ian Peter ian.peter at ianpeter.com

In addition to the rights theme, or perhaps in association with it, I would like to see a new theme of Public Policy and the Internet.
 
Internet Governance bodies do not all handle public policy consistently or in some cases at all. I think there is a lot we can gain by examining this in more detail.
 
 
 
Ian Peter
PO Box 429
Bangalow NSW 2479
Australia
Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
www.ianpeter.com
 
 

________________________________

From:Max Senges [mailto:maxsenges at gmail.com] 
Sent: 12 December 2008 03:02
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Meryem Marzouki; Parminder
Subject: Re: [governance] Themes for the coming IGFs
 
Hello 

I also want to thank Janette to start the discussion about next years themes. Naturally the focus of the Internet Rights and Principles [1]  coalition is to promote a "Rights based approach to Internet Governance" as main theme.

We plan to have a mid-term meeting in Rome which we can use to coordinate and prepare events with a Rights and Principles focus.

If you are interested in pushing a "Rights based approach to Internet Governance" as main IGF theme 2009  please join our discussion on http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/bill-of-rights

best
max




[1] we have the name change from Internet Bill of Rights on our agenda for next weeks monthly meeting.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Meryem Marzouki <marzouki at ras.eu.org> wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've thought that, for 60 years and one day now, there is no question on whether one buys or not into a right approach. The only remaining question, in any new context - like, here, IG - being how.

Le 11 déc. 08 à 15:56, Jeanette Hofmann a écrit :
 


Meryem Marzouki wrote:
Le 11 déc. 08 à 12:55, Jeanette Hofmann a écrit :

Ralf Bendrath wrote:
 As I
said there, I am a bit sceptical if it's a good idea to put human rights
up for discussion, but this probably depends on the framing. "Translating
and implementing human rights for IG" would go in the right direction.

Yes, one could also frame it a bit broader such as 'the role of rights in IG'. That would make certainly a good main session. I spoke against the 'rights based approach to IG' as an overall theme at the caucus meeting but I would support this topic for a main session.
I don't see what "the role of rights in IG" (or in anything else) could mean.

I meant to frame it in a way that integrates people who have concerns with a rights based approach. "Towards" suggests that all participants buy into this approach.
jeanette

Let's frame it differently, e.g. "Towards an IG framework
compliant with human rights and democratic principles" or something with similar meaning. This, BTW, would allow to keep the issue of access on the table, although framed differently.____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
   governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
   governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
   http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
   governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
   governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
   http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
   governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
   governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
   http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



-- 
-------------------------------------------------

"The world of the senses is just the base camp:
we are meant to be as much at home in consciousness as in the world of physical reality.
[...] We are not cabin-dwellers, born to a life cramped and confined;
we are meant to explore, to seek, to push the limits of our potential as human beings"
                                               (Easwaran, Bhagavad Gita, p. 10)

-------------------------------------------------
Dr. Max Senges

www.maxsenges.com
www.knowledgeentrepreneur.com
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20081211/cffafd4c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance