[governance] Re: [A2k] DCOS Agreement on Procurement in Support of Interoperability and Open Standards emerges at 3rd IGF, Hyderabad

Sat Dec 6 21:22:00 EST 2008

Philippe and all,

  You make a very good point in your last statement/sentance.

  Likely what would or could be a better approach is for individuals
and organizations to put forth their own statements, rather than directly
endorse or not endorse the Hyderabad statement.  After all, input as
to what that statement was or perhaps should have been was extremely
limited at best.

  From our members perspective, we did and so support PARTS
of the Hyderabad statement, but not the statement in it's entirety.

Philippe Aigrain wrote:

> This is great, and entirely consistent with the standards, interoperability
> and procurement provisions of the Public Policies section of the 2020 FLOSS
> roadmap that was presented last week at the Open World Forum in Paris last
> week.
> http://www.openworldobservatory.org/download/owf_roadmap_20020.pdf
> (pages 25-35)
>
> Just one remark, it is not very clear how other organizations and individuals
> can endorse the Hyderabad statement.
>
> Best,
>
> Philippe Aigrain
>
> Le Saturday 06 December 2008 13:06:02 Thiru Balasubramaniam, vous avez écrit :
> > http://www.keionline.org/blogs/2008/12/06/dcos-agreement-on-procurement-in-
> >support-of-interoperability-and-open-standards-emerges-at-3rd-igf-hyderabad/
> >
> > http://www.keionline.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=216
> >
> > DCOS Agreement on Procurement in Support of Interoperability and Open
> > Standards emerges at 3rd IGF, Hyderabad
> >
> > 6 December 2008
> >
> > At the close of the final day of the 3rd Internet Governance Forum in
> > Hyderabad, India, the Dynamic Coalition on Open Standards (DCOS)
> > released an agreement entitled the Dynamic Coalition on Open
> > Standards (DCOS) Agreement on Procurement in Support of
> > Interoperability and Open Standards.
> >
> > Under the procurement agreement, governments, publicly funded and non-
> > profit institutions agree to promote interoperability and
> > accessibility through the use of open standards.
> >
> >  From Hyderabad: Malini Aisola and Thiru Balasubramaniam
> >
> > The full text of the agreement including a list of initial signatories
> > and endorsers, is available here:
> > http://www.keionline.org/blogs/2008/12/06/dcos-agreement-on-procurement-in-
> >support-of-interoperability-and-open-standards-emerges-at-3rd-igf-hyderabad/
> >
> > Dynamic Coalition on Open Standards (DCOS) Agreement on Procurement in
> > Support of Interoperability and Open Standards
> >
> > 3rd Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
> >
> > Hyderabad, India
> >
> > 6 December 2008
> > Preamble
> >
> > The Contracting Parties,
> >
> > Recalling the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS)
> > Declaration of Principles which states that [i]nternational standards
> > aim to create an environment where consumers can access services
> > worldwide regardless of underlying technology,
> >
> > Recognizing that standards are increasingly global concerns, involving
> > goods and services that move in international trade across borders,
> >
> > Aware that current competition and legal remedies may not be enough to
> > solve the inherent tensions that routinely arise in the realm of
> > patents and standards,
> >
> > Desirous of encouraging procurement policies that require evaluation
> > of multiple, competing products based on open ICT standards in order
> > to ensure a level playing field for vendors, governments and consumers,
> >
> > Cognizant of the need for procurement policies for software programs
> > that are predicated upon an open standard,
> >
> > Open Standards
> >
> > Given the multiplicity of interpretations of the term open standards,
> > for the purpose of this document we endorse as an acceptable
> > definition the position contained in the European Unions draft
> > European Interoperability Framework:
> >
> > 1) The open standard is adopted and will be maintained by a not-for-
> > profit organisation, and its ongoing development occurs on the basis
> > of an open decision-making procedure available to all interested
> > parties (consensus or majority decision etc.).
> > 2) The open standard has been published and the standard specification
> > document is available either freely or at a nominal charge. It must be
> > permissible to all to copy, distribute and use it for no fee or at a
> > nominal fee.
> > 3) The intellectual property - i.e. patents possibly present - of
> > (parts of) the open standard is made irrevocably available on a
> > royalty free basis.
> > 4) There are no constraints on the re-use of the standard.
> >
> > (IDABC EIF v2 draft (http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/en/document/7728))
> >
> > As noted in the European Interoperability Framework cited above, open
> > standards or technical specifications must allow all interested
> > parties to implement the standards and to compete on quality and
> > price. The goal is to have a competitive and innovative industry, not
> > to protect market shares by raising obstacles to newcomers. Thus, open
> > standards or technical specifications must be possible to implement in
> > software distributed under the most commonly used open source
> > licences, with no limitations arising from IPR associated with the
> > standard in question.
> >
> > In addition to the above requirements, it is recommended that there
> > should be multiple independent implementations of the standard.
> >
> > Governments, publicly funded and non-profit institutions agree to
> > implement the following policies.
> >
> > Governments, publicly funded and non-profit institutions
> > Hereby agree to the following measures in order to promote
> > interoperability and accessibility through the use of open standards.
> >
> > 1. To create a policy statement on interoperability and open
> > standards, to be available to employees and the public.
> >
> > 2. By 2010, procurement of all software should be vendor neutral and
> > implement open standards
> >
> > 3. By 2010, tender specifications for hardware (including peripherals
> > and mobile devices) should require that manufacturers provide the
> > driver and interface information necessary to work with a reasonable
> > range of proprietary and free operating system platforms.
> >
> > 4. By 2010, all public facing web pages should conform to W3C
> > standards for structure, presentation and accessibility.
> >
> > 5. By 2010, tenders for the supply of web based services (for example,
> > online reservations) must specify the requirements of point 4.
> >
> > 6. By 2010, agencies should implement policies regarding the storage
> > and archiving of government data and records to ensure that data is
> > stored in open data and document formats.
> >
> > Signed by the following parties:
> >
> > Aslam Raffee, Government IT Officers Council, OSS Working Group,
> > Republic of South Africa
> >
> > Association for Progressive Communications (APC)
> >
> > Bob Jolliffe, Freedom To Innovate, South Africa
> >
> > Centre for Internet and Society, India
> >
> > Eddan Katz, Electronic Frontier Foundation
> >
> > Hamid Rabiee, Sharif University of Technology, Iran
> >
> > Knowledge Ecology International
> >
> > Moving Republic, India
> >
> > Shuttleworth Foundation, South Africa
> >
> > Swathanthra Malayalam Computing, India
> >
> > Endorsed by the following parties:
> >
> > Bangladesh Friendship Education Society, Bangladesh
> >
> > Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), India
> >
> > Foundation for Media Alternatives, Philippines
> >
> > OpenForum Europe
>
> --
> Philippe Aigrain (message personnel)
> http://paigrain.debatpublic.net
> _______________________________________________
> A2k mailing list
> A2k at lists.essential.org
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!"  Barack ( Berry ) Obama

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance