[governance] Net Neutrality Opponent Calls Google a "Bandwidth Hog"
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Sun Dec 7 03:23:31 EST 2008
All,
For some of us, this is not exactly news. Yet, despite Googles
"Green" image, it is rather contrary to what Google is projecting
and decidedly politically incorrect. But of course, Googles own
marketing/propaganda blog attempts to mitigate the facts. Oh my!
Vint, perhaps some more inside Google "Evangelizing" would
be helpful to address this problem in light of the energy crunch
as well as the financial crunch that the whole world is suffering
would be far better PR, for Google as well as more in line with
the upcoming Obama administration, lest President Elect Obama
starts off on the wrong foot?
See:
"According to PC World, an analyst with ties to
the telecom industry in a baseless attack on the concept of Net
Neutrality has
http://www.pcworld.com/article/155076/google_bandwidth_hog.html?tk=rss_news
accused Google Inc. of being a bandwidth hog. Quoting: '"Internet
connections could be more affordable for everyone, if Google paid its
fair share of the Internet's cost," wrote Cleland in the report. "It is
ironic
that Google, the largest user of Internet capacity pays the least
relatively
to fund the Internet's cost; it is even more ironic that the company
poised
to profit more than any other from more broadband deployment, expects
the American taxpayer to pick up its skyrocketing bandwidth tab."'
Google
http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/12/response-to-phone-companies-google.html
responded on their public policy blog, citing 'significant
methodological
and factual errors that undermine his report's conclusions.' Ars
Technica
http://arstechnica.com/journals/law.ars/2008/12/05/can-we-get-some-better-telecom-shills-please
highlighted some of Cleland's faulty reasoning as well.
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list