[governance] co-coordinator election results

[Adam Peake]

>If none has any objection, I agree to the proposal that the next 
>elections are held after IGF, Hyderabad, and I continue in the 
>position of co-coordinator till then.
>
>However, instead of Jan 2009, it is good to hold elections in 
>December of each year, so that after the outgoing co-coordinator 
>have contributed to the immediately post IGF activities, like 
>reports etc, the new coordinator take charge on January 1 giving the 
>new coordinator good time to prepare for the Feb IGF consultations.
>


I think this is a very sensible suggestion.  It would be good to get 
elections out of the way before any deadline for contributions to the 
next consultations. Can't be sure they will always be held in 
February but it certainly is the pattern.

I also want to thank Parminder.  It's hard enough trying to 
coordinate the caucus when there are two, it seems Parminder's been 
alone for much of his term.  Many thanks to him.

And congratulations Ian!

Best,

Adam



>Parminder
>
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
>For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance