[process] Re: [governance] USG on ICANN - no movement here

[Parminder]

>Let's focus on the better options.
> 
>        -- Bret


Yes, that's what I do.

In fact my email from which McTim picked the reference to 'neo-imperialist
view', to seek caucus proceedings against me, deals at length with my
approach to seeking such options, and solicits other members comments...

Parminder 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bret Fausett [mailto:bfausett at internet.law.pro]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:54 PM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Subject: Re: [process] Re: [governance] USG on ICANN - no movement here
> 
> On Aug 6, 2008, at 2:35 AM, Parminder wrote:
> > And someone who supports such unilateral control by one country, and
> > derides
> > those who seek change, both_of_which_John_clearly_did, (does he or
> > you deny
> > that) clearly professes neo-imperialist ideology (especially when
> > one is the
> > citizen/ resident of that controlling country).
> 
> Here's where I think you missed it, Parminder. It's possible to
> support unilateral control by the U.S. as the best among several bad
> options, and not be an imperialist. An imperialist would want to
> retain U.S. control even in the face of better options. (That's not
> JL.) Let's focus on the better options.
> 
>        -- Bret
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance